Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:10:28 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r253680 in CURRENT breaks GH ports and maybe others Message-ID: <1375276228.4960.3681111.005EA613@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <51F90B8D.4030808@mail.lifanov.com> References: <831982af5f96759f17d21aba62b02eb6@mail.lifanov.com> <20130731144853.2a13617b@bsd64.grem.de> <51F90B8D.4030808@mail.lifanov.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, at 8:05, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: > > I fully agree. We already checksum the *distfiles*. > It shouldn't be important what the source is. > > Are there any objections to adding --no-verify-peer to FETCH_ARGS across > the board? > Won't that break fetch for users whose fetch doesn't support --no-verify-peer? # fetch --no-verify-peer https://foo.com/bar.tar.gz fetch: illegal option -- -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1375276228.4960.3681111.005EA613>