Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 15:35:09 +0200 (METDST) From: hm@hcs.de (Hellmuth Michaelis) To: chris@sdata.de (Christoph Splittgerber) Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sporadic hangs Message-ID: <m115r5y-00014jC@hcswork.hcs.de> In-Reply-To: <3791D256.C3738839@sdata.de> from Christoph Splittgerber at "Jul 18, 99 03:10:46 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From the keyboard of Christoph Splittgerber: > Hellmuth, > in the last email, you wrote me a few days ago, you said that you are > not going to commit the new release into the -stable branch in the near > future. Today, I was reading your README where you encourage all users > of -stable to upgrade to 00.82.00. So, if this is your recommendation, > what is the reason not to commit the changes to 3.X-stable? IMWN This is what i wrote someone else asking this: Seriosly, committing to current is already a _huge_ amount of work, which goes like: get the FreeBSD i4b, run diffs between all files, look through the diffs to find out things changed, merge new i4b into old i4b, test the whole stuff, commit the whole stuff. It takes some days. For -stable, i won't do this. First, i don't have the time (my wife is pregnant in the 9th month with our second kid) and second, i dont want to burn my fingers committing to stable, because this means, it really _HAS_ to be stable, which it is not for every card there is a driver available in i4b. I also expect it would raise my load significantly, because i have to maintain (!) the stable version then (because it has to be stable ...). hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis Tel +49 40 559747-70 HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH Fax +49 40 559747-77 Oldesloer Strasse 97-99 Mail hm [at] hcs.de 22457 Hamburg WWW http://www.hcs.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m115r5y-00014jC>