Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:58:16 +0000
From:      James Raftery <james@kerna.ie>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Different snapshot sizes.
Message-ID:  <20041116235816.GD52797@fry.kerna.ie>
In-Reply-To: <16794.35765.800111.518475@canoe.dclg.ca>
References:  <16794.35765.800111.518475@canoe.dclg.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 06:22:29PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> But the snapshots are often different sizes.  This strikes me as odd,
> as I understood the "format" of a snapshot was to be the same as the
> "format" of the partition itself --- so they should all have the same
> size as the physical partition.

(To my surprise also) snapshot files seem to contain more data that one
might expect. There's a comment in the code that says `Write out the
list of allocated blocks to the end of the snapshot' (pointed out by
folks on my local BSD mailing list. Full thread at [0]). Changes in the
`list of allocated blocks' might account for the differences you're
seeing.


[0] http://lists.redbrick.dcu.ie/pipermail/bugi/2004-August/thread.html#579

ATB,
james



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041116235816.GD52797>