Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 19:38:31 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc40 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <20050523023831.GC62971@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0505212152420.33827@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <200505162031.j4GKVMOR038312@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050521.144236.74702484.chat95@mac.com> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0505212152420.33827@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:54:08PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sat, 21 May 2005, NAKATA Maho wrote: > > do you think we also mark CONFLICT for gcc-ooo (a gcc port > > based on gcc-3.4.1 esp. for OpenOffice.org compilation)? > > Certainly; please feel free to add gcc-ooo at the end of all the > CONFLICTS lines in the other gcc ports. > > However, I think we should see to use one of the regular ports in the > future instead of having a special port just for the purpose of building > OpenOffice.org. At the moment gcc-ooo has some needed patches that were rejected for GCC 3.4. So we have no choice - unless we add the patches to the gcc34 port. I investigated doing that, but I wasn't comfortable with the changes the patches make to add them to gcc34 for general use. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050523023831.GC62971>