Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 12:56:46 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard <jordanhubbard@icloud.com> To: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> Cc: Rakshith Venkatesh <vrock28@gmail.com>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CEPH + FreeBSD Message-ID: <88732E11-8570-4D02-9374-3F1419EABC6F@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: <5661752C.1090200@digiware.nl> References: <CANw0z%2BVhYCPNWrjByXLf8yO9wA0sc05_8eVJsM-McjcGNU9KQg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BKW7xQrN60kH37hu2Keja60a0huVjAyP6=SQNSrqus2EUMUMA@mail.gmail.com> <CANw0z%2BXrwK=6y%2BLpoiewc_eLDBYB5UZ5XpU6-YP0-K2FKwSa5w@mail.gmail.com> <A19FDEB5-1DEF-4EBF-8E9E-A1AD4688F1AA@icloud.com> <5661752C.1090200@digiware.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Dec 4, 2015, at 3:12 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> = wrote: >=20 > Talking to Sage Weill, he said that one of the main things to keep > FreeBSD-Ceph up and running, is the possibility to actually run the > automated builds and tests on a FreeBSD system. So that is something = I/we > need to think about. I think sufficient cloud resources to run a jenkins CI environment or = something which does the builds on commit triggers and runs regression = tests are the easy part - we run dozens (if not hundreds) of virtual = FreeBSD instances in multiple datacenters to facilitate our own testing = and donating a VM to this effort would be trivial. I=E2=80=99m more intrigued by the part of the sentence which says =E2=80=9C= to keep FreeBSD-Ceph up and running=E2=80=9D since it implies that Ceph = on FreeBSD is already working? It was my understanding that we were = more at the part of the story where =E2=80=9Csufficiently motivated and = skilled filesystem porting engineers=E2=80=9D could not be found, and if = that=E2=80=99s changed then that=E2=80=99s obviously a different ball = game! Thanks, - Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88732E11-8570-4D02-9374-3F1419EABC6F>