Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:51:13 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Eirik =?utf-8?q?=C3=98verby?= <ltning@anduin.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS snapshot weirdness Message-ID: <200802131851.15014.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <5B010AC7-C292-45E6-A109-20E39B370604@anduin.net> References: <79029E40-6E43-4482-8E39-D1DE49C8C53A@anduin.net> <200802122311.43247.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <5B010AC7-C292-45E6-A109-20E39B370604@anduin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart6138948.92jFpG4kfU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Eirik =C3=98verby wrote: > Yes, I am absolutely sure of this. > > I considered using the snapshot tool, however I need to reduce > dependencies to an absolute minimum (as one target environment is > very strict on allowing additional software installs).. > > I use the snapshots to get a consistent file-backup with history. > This one puzzles me to no end. Hmm, that is very odd.. Maybe the FS is stuffed somehow :( =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart6138948.92jFpG4kfU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHsqh65ZPcIHs/zowRAg7WAJ0biIU+KMhLwGw6Lc/sVHavBE0EtwCfcWjf bfPtmbB9V5+YYh5A21cSEA0= =4Q1n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6138948.92jFpG4kfU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200802131851.15014.doconnor>