Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:16:47 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@c0mplx.org> To: current@FreeBSD.org Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc) Message-ID: <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code > > slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on > > platforms where clang is the system compiler. We definitely don't > > want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these for the > > lifetime of the 10.x branch. > > Isn't it a POLA violation? > > As for me I expect something like this: > . 9.x gcc default and clang in base; > . 10.x clang default and gcc in base; > . 11.x gcc withdraw. If the 150 ports that only work with gcc, all work with a ports gcc and do not need the gcc from base, would the following be OK ? - 9.x gcc default and clang in base; - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports; -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 7 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130823111647.GT2951>