Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:48:39 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Erik Cederstrand <erik+lists@cederstrand.dk> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@FreeBSD.org>, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Subject: Re: GCC withdraw Message-ID: <20130825154839.GL3796@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <B22F0FCE-AB91-4BC2-9DBA-342AA0291F67@cederstrand.dk> References: <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu> <521745F2.8050607@passap.ru> <CAOFF%2BZ3vbOgMO7T-BKZnhKte6=rFoGcdYcft5kpAgNH2my1JKg@mail.gmail.com> <20130824115158.GA88999@zxy.spb.ru> <EC9008A3-1737-470F-9067-C38FF13CFA20@FreeBSD.org> <20130824154217.GE3796@zxy.spb.ru> <20130824224204.GH3796@zxy.spb.ru> <D6A8F21E-C9AD-48C1-892E-80048343DCBA@freebsd.org> <1377440469.1111.124.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <B22F0FCE-AB91-4BC2-9DBA-342AA0291F67@cederstrand.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:24:23PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Expecting FreeBSD Clang maintainers to respond to compilation issues > in FreeBSD base seems perfectly reasonable. Expecting them to > respond to random issues in the ~24.000 ports is not. OK, how FreeBSD Clang maintainers can respond to issue with firewire? I don't imagine how to do this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130825154839.GL3796>