Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:45:42 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: imp@village.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SOCKS port inspires question... Message-ID: <199809230745.AAA11686@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199809230732.BAA18835@harmony.village.org> (message from Warner Losh on Wed, 23 Sep 1998 01:32:01 -0600)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* OK. I had hoped that you would say "Oh, yes, just check * __FreeBSD_MUMBLE_ELF__, which is always defined when you are building * elf executables"... No. Someone proposed __ELF__ but Bruce shot it down with a one-liner. :) * Yes. I guess I am. So it sounds like a reasonable thing to do then? * I hadn't planned on providing the symbolic link, since runsocks will * use the correct one for the application being run. That should be OK, * since applications never build against this library (and would fail to * work in odd ways if they tried). I think that's fine. Also, don't worry about trying to build both versions into one packgae, I think it's reasonable to ask people to install the a.out package if they want to run a.out binaries and the ELF package for ELF binaries (or both if they need both). Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809230745.AAA11686>