Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:37:13 +0100 From: Daniel Bilik <ddb@neosystem.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stf(4) on 10-stable Message-ID: <20160205093713.1c1453f9b5d06a6b366c44db@neosystem.cz> In-Reply-To: <20160114104937.57e14705ea345ad877db2ed5@neosystem.cz> References: <20151216170418.3c2ec09dfb87e9d09a026efd@neosystem.cz> <20160113091730.381f94e94fa5cb2b90960111@neosystem.cz> <20160114104937.57e14705ea345ad877db2ed5@neosystem.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:49:37 +0100 Daniel Bilik <ddb@neosystem.org> wrote: >> Should I create PR for this? > Created: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206231 Seems that 10-stable has just entered beta1, so unless some effort is put into fixing this, 10.3-release is probably gonna ship with broken 6to4 connectivity. -- Dan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160205093713.1c1453f9b5d06a6b366c44db>