Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 11:45:33 +0300 (EET DST) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Julian Jenkins <kaveman@magna.com.au> Cc: FreeBSD ports list <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports/print/ghostscript4 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960802114358.17950I-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960802101802.28325G-100000@kavemachine.magna.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Julian Jenkins wrote: > On Thu, 1 Aug 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > If you read the original poster's message again, you'll note that he > > was complaining about packages being installed with a fascist umask, > > and whether or not pkg_add should set the umask. The ports hack won't > > help this case. > > Those people need only use a script along the lines of: > > #!/bin/sh > OLD_UMASK=`umask` > umask 022 > pkg_add $* > umask $OLD_UMASK A good script... It could perhaps become upkg_add (as in user friendly pkg_add or umask setting pkg_add. Sander > > > I'm sure the forgetfull but knowledgeable among us could set this up. Or > this could be given as part of a FAQ. > > Kaveman > kaveman@magna.com.au >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960802114358.17950I-100000>