Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Jan 1998 16:32:15 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        John Birrell <jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Architecture dependent source
Message-ID:  <199801082332.QAA10804@mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199801082134.IAA16192@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
References:  <199801082134.IAA16192@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Has the directory structure for architecture dependent source been
> decided?
> 
> For instance, does src/sys/i386 become src/sys/arch/i386 (like NetBSD)
> or do we just start adding src/sys/alpha because i386 sets the precedent?

Personally, I don't see that '/sys/arch' buys us anything other than
'Yet Another directory'.  Especially when there is no goal of having
every architecture under the sun working.

But, I have no say in the matter, that would be David's choice to make.



Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801082332.QAA10804>