Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:14:44 +0200
From:      Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To:        Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ULE status
Message-ID:  <20050208151444.1e2f2045@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <200502081400.07233.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
References:  <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net> <200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20050208144343.5bd6dd76@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <200502081400.07233.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:00:03 +0100
Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:43, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > There used to be a panic when
> > using rtprio to raise the priority of a running process, do you know if
> > it's fix ?
> 
> I never got any panics with ULE back when it was available, so I can't tell.

This was absolutely reproducible there is / was a PR on it.

> If you care about ULE, turn it on and see for yourself - more testers make 
> better testing.

I will do it it the weekend.

Thanks.

-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050208151444.1e2f2045>