Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 10:17:34 -0500 (EST) From: ADRIAN Filipi-Martin <adrian@ubergeeks.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: dyson@iquest.net, eivind@yes.no, rssh@grad.kiev.ua, grog@lemis.com, wes@softweyr.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: System V init (was: Linux to be deployed in Mexican schools; Where was FreeBSD?) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981202101447.9233B-100000@lorax.ubergeeks.com> In-Reply-To: <199812011846.LAA26117@usr07.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > The criticisms of the SYSV approach, especially in reference to > Elvind's prototype (rather than the BSD status quo, which is rather > indefensible from any angle save "stick in the mud"), are largely > valid. But that's not the point. The SYSV approach is (A) better Just constructive criticism. If we go this route, we need to do a superlative job for it to gain complete acceptance. > Feel free to propose any other approach that meets those same > design constraints and isn't the SYSV init system, and I think > you will find a lot of support. But it's unconsciable to do I actually kept quiet yesterday, so I could hack on an implementation that doesn't bother me quite so much. I hope to have something to show in a day or so after some testing. cheers, Adrian -- [ adrian@ubergeeks.com -- Ubergeeks Consulting -- http://www.ubergeeks.com/ ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.981202101447.9233B-100000>