Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:53:45 -0400 From: Alan E <alane@geeksrus.net> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: USE_AUTOMAKE/USE_AUTOCONF clear as mudd Message-ID: <200206211853.45738.alane@geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <20020621141116.A81863@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020621141116.A81863@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 21 June 2002 17:11, David O'Brien wrote: > I've read bsd.port.mk and tried all the perminations of USE_AUTOCONF, > USE_AUTOCONF_VER, USE_AUTOMAKE, USE_AUTOMAKE_VER to noavail. > > How does one depend on automake-1.5 and autoconf-2.53 ?? AUTOMAKE=3Dautomake AUTOCONF=3Dautoconf AUTOHEADER=3Dautoheader ACLOCAL=3Daclocal And nope, Mudd (at least Harcourt "Harry" Mudd), although a liar, was cle= arer. Mud, of a thick enough consistency, however, is probably about the same i= n=20 clarity. I've got old old old PRs waiting for portmgr@ that lay the framework for=20 addressing this problem. I guess I'll have to do the bsd.port.mk patch as= =20 well and then maybe portmgr@ will look at/commit the whole pile. --=20 AlanE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206211853.45738.alane>