Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:50:10 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at>
Cc:        freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: standards/62858: malloc(0) not C99 compliant 
Message-ID:  <89171.1078271410@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:39:54 %2B0100." <20040302223950.GF1021@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040302223950.GF1021@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>, Stefan Farfeleder writes:
>On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:37:31PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> I want to make sure people who malloc(0) and then deref the pointer get
>> the core dump they need to debug their problem.
>
>So you want malloc(0) to return a different pointer to unmapped memory
>every time it is called?

Yes.

>> Does the code also fail if you give
>> malloc the 'V' flag ?
>
>No, modulo PR bin/62859 where I forgot to CC you :)

I'll look at this tomorrow if I have time.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?89171.1078271410>