Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Nov 2017 21:02:14 +0200
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        "Conrad E. Meyer" <cem@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r325386 - head/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <20171105190214.GG2566@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfqApxd99G-HqVfe4x8EysYJVCAcHksqTeUuBAaYR1OjEA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201711041049.vA4AnZUE096709@repo.freebsd.org> <CAG6CVpUaXSX26Bc839kn96EXnUjtGyQ3_eNJPhsRB%2Bv6G6gH1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20171105130607.GA2566@kib.kiev.ua> <CAG6CVpV3SfV8VuNeMJEuN%2BMSu3424mK=HO_-YW9vRt9HEdcJZQ@mail.gmail.com> <20171105173032.GE2566@kib.kiev.ua> <CAG6CVpVQ4RSgz883ezsdExVDQ4RbSiR_y%2BZ5XWDNFeYBpMS-cQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfqApxd99G-HqVfe4x8EysYJVCAcHksqTeUuBAaYR1OjEA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 11:42:51AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > E.g.,
> >
> > --- a/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c
> > +++ b/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c
> > @@ -304,8 +304,7 @@ retry:
> >         }
> >
> >         if (bp->b_blkno == bp->b_lblkno) {
> > -               if (lbprev >= UFS_NDADDR)
> > -                       panic("ffs_realloccg: lbprev out of range");
> > +               ASSERT(lbprev < UFS_NDADDR, "ffs_realloccg: lbprev out
> > of range");
> >                 bp->b_blkno = fsbtodb(fs, bprev);
> >         }
> >
> 
> Just a side point: All these should be programming errors. The bogus data
> that comes or could come from the FS itself should remain always-on panics.
> Well, actually, they should transition from always-on panics to some sort
> of degraded mount that would be more resilient in the face of such
> corruption. But failing that, they should remain always-on panics :)

This is what I said in my reply before the last.

I still have no idea what is the point cem tries to express.

Nor I know what should the ASSERT() macro do in the kernel. If the
patch above really about replacing panic() with _K_ASSERT, then I most
likely agree with it, since the error catched is not due to the on-disk
metadata corruption.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171105190214.GG2566>