Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:16:34 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Erich Weiler <weiler@soe.ucsc.edu> Subject: Re: pf performance? Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokXL4jidSwTvwp9dwvffNQww1YcVPEOHyAjYRAQN_f9LA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bq%2BTcru%2BYRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <5176E5C1.9090601@soe.ucsc.edu> <20130426134224.GV76816@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2Bq%2BTcru%2BYRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26 April 2013 09:22, Olivier Cochard-Labb=E9 <olivier@cochard.me> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrot= e: >> >> In FreeBSD 10 pf is no longer under single lock. On your hardware, >> I'd expect a measurable performance gain if you migrate to 10. > > Compairing 9.1 and current (249908) on my new test-server (HP ProLiant > DL320 G5, dual-core Xeon 3050, dual Intel NIC). > Like usual: one unidirectional flow of small packets, values in > packet-per-seconds: > > x 9.1 > + current > N Min Max Median Avg Stdd= ev > x 5 379991 381508 381229 380892.6 667.699= 26 > + 5 332833 335502 334726 334223.2 1142.82= 66 > Difference at 95.0% confidence > -46669.4 +/- 1364.98 > -12.2526% +/- 0.358363% > (Student's t, pooled s =3D 935.915) Do you have witness, etc enabled in -current? adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokXL4jidSwTvwp9dwvffNQww1YcVPEOHyAjYRAQN_f9LA>