Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:02:52 +0200 From: Bernhard Fischer <bernhard.fischer@fh-stpoelten.ac.at> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: "M. L." <user@celeritystorm.com> Subject: Re: suPHP - secure/reliable? Message-ID: <200510101102.59262.bernhard.fischer@fh-stpoelten.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <43470F58.6070609@celeritystorm.com> References: <43470F58.6070609@celeritystorm.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2593763.aq3NGTtzqb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 08 October 2005 02:14, M. L. wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to know your opinions on suPHP. I was looking for some software > that would execute PHP scripts as the user who owns them, instead of > www, and came up with that. But the site is written in poor english, the > software consists on a root setuid binary, so I'm a bit worried about > the quality of this software. > > Does anyone have anything to say about suPHP, either good or bad stuff ? > I'd like your opinions. > > Regards, > > M. L. I don't know about suPHP but a chose a different way. I'm running a server for about 200 users (students) and I wanted to offer t= hem=20 full Apache+PHP functionallity without any restrictions. I decided to run 200 indepentent small Apache-Servers utilizing the=20 worker-Modell and the PHP5 module. Each Apache is listening on a separate=20 port (of course) and I use on master Apache with mod_rewrite to proxy=20 requests to user_dirs to the appropriate port number. Regards, bh --nextPart2593763.aq3NGTtzqb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDSi5D3zuWPWIClGgRApivAKDHVFd4tVQeza6rtQkKjjpNBKfO6ACgvy1y 9+mdxsGJvoZgLVHTUoz/hRg= =PLsG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2593763.aq3NGTtzqb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510101102.59262.bernhard.fischer>