Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:44:29 +0200
From:      Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com>
To:        Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net>
Subject:   Re: Taking bhyve step forward enterprise grade
Message-ID:  <CAEW%2Bogbr4NyAHLTKuiywgyU9apJj8Wg=wVk%2BpRJn_cM_Wv2_=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <15AC566F-82AD-4F76-9710-67669D344F4D@netgate.com>
References:  <CAEW%2BogZD8ZKJJr1X8-OU3MwYx1hObskXq4gFeEBNJECjPdzZLw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogYmHO3Jn7k3AYkFG-jZdaaHWTT40qu3Of1u%2BGH4yHmA1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogZ0e3z=VMt14MH7Yv-aRBdryi8y=Mn3=LApAGT=fx-KZQ@mail.gmail.com> <B5D24D4D-68BA-4479-8FD2-8B3775055C04@jnielsen.net> <15AC566F-82AD-4F76-9710-67669D344F4D@netgate.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
is it builtin already in 10.3? or in current only?
=D7=91=D7=AA=D7=90=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9A 19 =D7=91=D7=9E=D7=A8=D7=A5 2016 18:55=
,=E2=80=8F "Jim Thompson" <jim@netgate.com> =D7=9B=D7=AA=D7=91:

>
> > On Mar 19, 2016, at 10:55 AM, John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 19, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> hi,
> >> are there ongoing job on taking bhyve further steps toward enterprise
> scale
> >> like:
> >> 1. high availability, rules on vms (like affinity rules in vmware: eg =
an
> >> app vm and sql vm go together...), vmotion...
> >> 2. network virtualization like vmware nsx...
> >
> > The wiki pages probably the best place for general info on bhyve curren=
t
> and planned features: https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve
> >
> > Live migration is a planned feature. HA rules and other automation and
> orchestration are probably beyond the scope of what bhyve itself is aimin=
g
> to achieve, though such features could easily be provided by additional
> scripts and tools.
> >
> > What specifically are you after in terms of network virtualization?
> Again, bhyve itself isn't intended to be a giant umbrella but FreeBSD doe=
s
> support many networking features which could support network virtualizati=
on
> (and which work fine with bhyve).
>
> VALE is built-in to FreeBSD, and with the new netmap back-end for bhyve,
> serves as a good =E2=80=98base=E2=80=99 for a vswitch.
>
> Jim
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEW%2Bogbr4NyAHLTKuiywgyU9apJj8Wg=wVk%2BpRJn_cM_Wv2_=A>