Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:41:24 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213174123.GB61672@dutch.freebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150213171859.GZ75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> References: <20150213171859.GZ75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:18:59PM -0500, William Bulley wrote: > According to Dutch Ingraham <stoa@gmx.us> on Fri, 02/13/15 at 12:06: > > > > I don't recall having a problem building it; in fact, I installed on a > > couple of different machines. The first one I compiled with GTK3, but > > that had a tendency to crash often (at least at first), so I built the > > next machine with GTK2. Other than visually, there doesn't seem to be > > much difference between the two in high-level operation (i.e., no config > > differences.) Both of these builds were done this year on 10.1-RELEASE > > versions of amd64. > > Well, that is strange then. I'm also running amd64. Everything was > built afresh about two weeks ago: system (buildworld, installworld), > ports (svn update /usr/ports), and yet when I run this command: > > # portmaster -K -B -D www/xombrero > > the build fails and I get the same error signature as listed in that > unresolved bugzilla report from August 2014. The xombrero-1.6.3,2 > description on freebsd.org: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/xombrero/ > > lists most recent changes about two months ago, so I'm getting the > same source as you must have. I'm very confused about all this... > > Regards, > > web... Well, I don't use those parameters, but they shouldn't cause a build problem. Have you tried building with <MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes>? (I also presume you are using the standard base clang compiler?)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150213174123.GB61672>