Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:25:52 -0600 From: Christopher Schulte <schulte+freebsd@nospam.schulte.org> To: thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org, Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org, Craig Boston <craig@meoqu.gank.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Expect buildworld instability (sendmail 8.12.2 MFC) Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020325171650.0471a740@pop3s.schulte.org> In-Reply-To: <20020326000804.A80247@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <15519.43708.643975.266286@horsey.gshapiro.net> <15519.37768.192688.770945@horsey.gshapiro.net> <3C9F9C81.10203@meoqu.gank.org> <15519.41048.709126.956805@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20020325231720.B75467@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <15519.41563.608637.748981@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20020325232633.D75467@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <15519.42443.783285.129952@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20020325235205.A78568@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <15519.43708.643975.266286@horsey.gshapiro.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:08 AM 3/26/2002 +0100, Thomas Quinot wrote: >You proposed solution (YES/NO/NONE) looks fine to me. Agreed. As long as the new behavior of "sendmail_enable" is documented clearly in the release notes/UPDATING/whatever, NONE as an option should be OK. A faq entry may be appropriate, based on question volume after the changes are in place and documented. Thanks, Gregory. >-- > Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG -- Christopher Schulte http://www.schulte.org/ Do not un-munge my @nospam.schulte.org email address. This address is valid. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20020325171650.0471a740>