Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:49:52 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Sascha Schumann <sascha@schumann.cx>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Conclusion of thread "Deadlocks with recent SMP current"?
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410022223070.1355@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20041002200901.GA53162@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.60.0410022154210.1355@localhost> <20041002200901.GA53162@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes, this is believed to have been resolved in 5.3.

     Good to hear.

> So, you're running 5.2 on those systems, which was documented as a
> development release and not recommended for use on production systems

     No, *I* am not running FreeBSD 5 anywhere on productive
     systems.  Unfortunaly, the ISP recommended it to this
     particular owner of two systems where I am doing some
     voluntary work in my spare time.

     One of the servers ran 5.1 with an uptime of >200 days.
     There were no indications that 5.2 contained such vast
     regressions in comparison to 5.1.  Even today, the 5.2.1
     errata page does not say anything about SMP issues.

> (and indeed contained numerous rough edges and bugs), and you're
> scared to update to 5.3 which is going to be designated as the
> beginning of the 5.3-STABLE branch (and has had a couple of months of
> extensive bugfixing and QA)?

     I would rather downgrade to 5.1 (because I know it works
     reliably on this piece of equipment), but unfortunately,
     somewhere during "make installworld", the install binary
     starts to segfault.

     truss shows that the 5.1 /usr/bin/install calls the new
     fstatfs syscall 397.  AFAICT this could only happen when the
     5.1 install binary is linked against the 5.2 libc.  I suppose
     installworld does not point LD_LIBRARY_PATH at the newly
     build libraries under /usr/obj?  If not, what is the best way
     to ensure that binaries are linked against suitable libs
     during installworld?

     Thanks
     - Sascha



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.60.0410022223070.1355>