Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:34:58 +0100
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sh scripting question
Message-ID:  <20201016123458.2e7f0eaf74adf4eb1443a69e@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <20201016132516.71e06c69@archlinux>
References:  <d50ba2c9-617f-6842-ef89-f5933be8f8b3@hotmail.com> <DB8PR06MB64427D88E17F02711EE657A3F6030@DB8PR06MB6442.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <20201016113408.16d58d68@archlinux> <DB8PR06MB644292D3C0309B5DADADF69BF6030@DB8PR06MB6442.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <20201016132516.71e06c69@archlinux>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:25:16 +0200
Ralf Mardorf <ralf-mardorf@riseup.net> wrote:

> I can't notice a different philosophy. We agree again. I just wanted to
> point out, that our scripts might need to be able to handle some
> imported iDroidWindowsCamEmailAttachment file names, at least to some
> extend, but we and anybody using systems we might administrate, should
> apply a minimum of convention, compatibility, portability.
> 
> Let alone that a apart from little girls nobody tend to name a file
> 
> ***such a cute cat ;)...

	But somebody might have an NFS or SMB mounted home directory on a
workstation set to use Shift-JIS and produce filenames that look really
weird from the console.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20201016123458.2e7f0eaf74adf4eb1443a69e>