Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:16:05 -0700 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..? Message-ID: <c53c3204dc47a42e86837401488b736f@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20150724010003.GO84931@FreeBSD.org> References: <55B17B7A.4080402@gmail.com> <20150723234805.GK84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18488.9060602@sorbs.net> <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com> <CAKFCL4VVtLspj%2BRQxSHjyQxAhixPuMiQoehoA2MYWeSgqTTwAQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org> <20150724004443.GC1370@lonesome.com> <20150724004939.GN84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18CA8.1020909@sorbs.net>, <20150724010003.GO84931@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:00:03 +0000 Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote .. > FreeBSD kernel grew since 10.1-RELEASE, so this is not unexpected. Not trying to hijack the thread, or anything. But on that note; does FreeBSD keep a graph, or anything that indicates kernel [size] over major versions? I'm sure I'm not the only one that would find this interesting. :) --Chris > > Glen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c53c3204dc47a42e86837401488b736f>