Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:40:19 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ncurses: 4.x -> 5.x buildworld failure + patch Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107191836050.1085-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200107171419.f6HEJ0i21175@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107171803030.65109-100000@besplex.bde.org>,
> Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote:
> > I have used essentially the same patch (with ${LDFLAGS} instead of
> > -static) for a year or two, but I don't quite understand why you needed
> > it. make_keys and make_hash are build-tools, so they should get built
> > in the host environment and be linked to the host shared libraries (if
> > any). The command line seems to show them being built in the target
> > environment (-I/usr/obj/c/src/alpha/usr/include).
>
> In my case, make_keys was built once in the build tools phase. Then
> in the building libraries phase, it was rebuilt 4 times and executed
> successfully after each rebuild. Finally, in the make dependencies
> phase, it was built yet again. It was in that phase that executing it
> failed.
That would certainly break it. Here it doesn't get rebuilt at all
(here = an i386 with no cross-compiling, and a modifed src/Makefile.inc1
which doesn't create .depend files).
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0107191836050.1085-100000>