Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: SysV IPC related question
Message-ID:  <20020814073352.47515.qmail@web21109.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D599D77.C1657E75@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> wrote:
> I don't know why NetBSD doesn't have this.  Perhaps they are
> unconcerned with the portability of code using SYSV message
> queues, when it comes to internal structure packing.
> 
> I would think directly casting it to a long in the kernel would
> be a bad thing on Alpha, with certain source code in user space.
> 
> I expect that they define it for the regression test so that
> they can actually do regression on these cases.

I was going on about:
basesrc/regress/sys/kern/sysvmsg

> > Also, if possible, could you outline some situations where this would be
> > used?  Help will be very appreicated.
> 
> It's because if you don't ask for a specific meswsage type (e.g.
> it is important for you to get messages in the order they were
> sent), then you can't control which message will be returned in
> your message buffer passed to msgrcv(2).
> [ ... ]

Thank you for the information.  Very appreciated, as always. 8-)

  -- Hiten

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020814073352.47515.qmail>