Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:40:08 -0800 (PST) From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/23419: 'make buildkernel' doesn't work in isolation from 'make buildworld' Message-ID: <200012112040.eBBKe8T74791@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR conf/23419; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: joe@tao.org.uk, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/23419: 'make buildkernel' doesn't work in isolation from 'make buildworld' Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:33:49 +0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:57:41AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Because it is not supposed to. The whole purpose of buildkernel was > that it should use the same (up-to-date) set of tools that is used > for the rest of the world. The correct and established sequence is > ``buildworld'' followed by ``buildkernel''. Shouldn't it then build the tools that it needs if they've not already been built? Who's to say that last world built was of the same generation as the kernel that's being built? Here's the problem. I want to build kernels for picobsd in a different object directory, so as to not conflict with any other kernel builds. Joe -- Josef Karthauser [joe@FreeBSD.org, joe@tao.org.uk] ......... FreeBSD: The power to change the world ........ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012112040.eBBKe8T74791>