Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:28:01 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper Message-ID: <20021112172801.GA60237@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200211121234.gACCYNpD019022@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <20021112101236.GB8744@dragon.nuxi.com> <200211121234.gACCYNpD019022@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:34:23PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > Do we have consensus on this? The perl wrapper really isn't working out > > for all the cases I hoped it would when I committed it. > > Yes, I think so. DES (The author?) doesn't mind. I'm for removal and so is > Kris. Why does DES have to be asked? I did the import. It does not matter where the code came from. Do I need to send out a **HEADS UP** to make it absolutely clear what is being proposed? Or can I move forward working on the theory that working nice for ports building is sufficient backing? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021112172801.GA60237>