Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:28:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "f.johan.beisser" <jan@caustic.org> To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: true aliased interface? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241825590.43945-100000@pogo.caustic.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241248430.24335-100000@snafu.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
the real advantage is for a goofy test i'd like to do. basically, i want to have the two interfaces on one physical for natd on one machine, without installing two cards. if i can accomplish this with just ifconfig, i would, but i can't seem to dig up any info on it. -- jan On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Mike Hoskins wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, f.johan.beisser wrote: > > > fxp0 flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu=1500 > > inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > > fxp0.1 flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu=1500 > > inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.255 > > etc... > > Hmm... like cisco subifs. What would this accomplish? The traffic is > still going over the same physical interface... so is the subif desire > for cosmetic purposes, or is there some performance aspect in mind? > > -mrh > +-----/ f. johan beisser /------------------------------+ email: jan[at]caustic.org web: http://www.caustic.org/~jan "knowledge is power. power corrupts. study hard, be evil." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241825590.43945-100000>