Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 May 2001 08:17:12 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Andresen,Jason R." <jandrese@mitre.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        Nadav Eiron <nadav@cs.Technion.AC.IL>, <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: technical comparison
Message-ID:  <20010523081344.R87127-100000@nausicaa.mitre.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010522144728.B29988@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:27:27PM +0300, Nadav Eiron wrote:
> > I ran tests that I think are similar to what Jason ran on identically
> > configured FreeBSD and Linux/ReiserFS machines. ResierFS is much much
> > faster than UFS+softupdates on these tests.
> >
> > Linux (2.2.14-5 + ReiserFS):
> > Time:
> >         164 seconds total
> >         97 seconds of transactions (103 per second)
> >
> > Files:
> >         65052 created (396 per second)
> >                 Creation alone: 60000 files (1090 per second)
> >                 Mixed with transactions: 5052 files (52 per second)
> >         4936 read (50 per second)
> >         5063 appended (52 per second)
> >         65052 deleted (396 per second)
> >                 Deletion alone: 60104 files (5008 per second)
> >                 Mixed with transactions: 4948 files (51 per second)
> >
> > Data:
> >         24.83 megabytes read (155.01 kilobytes per second)
> >         336.87 megabytes written (2.05 megabytes per second)
> >
> > FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE (ufs/softupdates):
>
> Did you enable write caching?  You didn't mention, and it's off by
> default in 4.3, but I think enabled by default on Linux.

I tried to leave the FreeBSD and Linux boxes as unchanged as possible for
my tests (they are lab machines that have other uses, although I made sure
they were idle during the test periods).

I left write caching enabled in the Linux boxes, and left it disabled on
the FreeBSD boxes.  Personally, I'm hesitant to enable write caching
on FreeBSD because we tend to use it on machines where we really really
don't want to lose data.  Write caching is ok on the Linux machines
because we use them as pure testbeds that we can reconstruct easily if
their disks go south.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010523081344.R87127-100000>