Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:16:07 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, "Arne H. Juul" <arnej@pvv.ntnu.no>, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: close() of active socket does not work on FreeBSD 6 Message-ID: <200612120816.07608.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0612112259050.12159@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no> References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0612111535280.32258@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no> <20061211171115.GD311@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0612112259050.12159@decibel.pvv.ntnu.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 06:34, Arne H. Juul wrote: <snip> > This is exactly the sort of issue that should be solved by the > thread library / kernel threads implementation and not in every > threaded application that needs it, in my view. > It should not be done in new thread library, do you want a bloat and error-prone thread library ? Instead if this semantic is really necessary, it should be done in kernel. > - Arne H. J. David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612120816.07608.davidxu>