Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:54:04 +0300 From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, cy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports && 10-CURRENT Message-ID: <CALa-7vxh_fEJ1yzw%2BRSB23fo8JgyMydwvBPcnDQ9P9%2BzTOERMA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201306191332.r5JDWeqs006143@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <guru@unixarea.de> <20130619132325.GB30671@sh4-5.1blu.de> <201306191332.r5JDWeqs006143@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> wrote: > You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do > not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with > it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate > x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use > devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not. > There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if > we don't need it. It's extra baggage. If follow this logic, net/vnc should to bundle it's own C compiler then... -- Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALa-7vxh_fEJ1yzw%2BRSB23fo8JgyMydwvBPcnDQ9P9%2BzTOERMA>