Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 15:56:56 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: nate@sri.MT.net, rkw@dataplex.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Standard Shipping Containers - A Proposal for Distributing FreeBSD Message-ID: <199605170626.PAA10859@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199605170421.WAA06771@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at May 16, 96 10:21:33 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh stands accused of saying: > apply it, so it is no muss, no fuss. Easily more up to date that sup > ever was for me. I resisted for a long time going to ctm because I > thought it wouldn't give me the access that sup gave me. It has > worked 1000% better than sup ever did for me. This is usually > sufficient because relatively little changes in any given four hour > period. All this discussion is telling us is that there are several different ways by which FreeBSD source code is distributed, and each of these different ways works well for different people. What's wrong with things as they are? Why should anyone feel compelled to change things if they're not broken? > Warner -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605170626.PAA10859>