Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:01:59 -0500 From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net> To: "Doug Barton" <DougB@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enhancements to the new rc.d/jail script Message-ID: <001301c30816$f55e5a50$13fd2fd8@Admin02> References: <200304200055.h3K0tHJB005595@WBIw009.westbend.net> <20030420140251.W631@znfgre.tberna.bet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Doug Barton" <DougB@freebsd.org> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > > > Attached are patches for the new rc.d/jail script. > > This looks like good work, thanks! My only question, how will this devfs > stuff affect a system that isn't running jails? > The only affect it would have is having ruleset 10 defined, but not used on the non-jail system. If a sys admin defines ruleset 10 in /etc/rc.devfs, then either the 2 will be merged or the rc.d/devfs ruleset will be overwritten (if "/sbin/devfs rule -s 10 delset" is in /etc/rc.devfs). Scot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001301c30816$f55e5a50$13fd2fd8>