Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2000 18:13:41 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@calcaphon.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys bus.h bus_private.h src/sys/kern subr_bus.c Message-ID: <6940.962640821@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 03 Jul 2000 15:42:06 BST." <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007031532370.20885-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007031532370.20885-100000@localhost>, Nick Hibma wri tes: >Apart from that you haven't mentioned a reason why resetting the softc >for both functions is a better idea than having a separate softc for >the logical device. Each function surely has some private data (for >example resources allocated to it). Why would you want to stuff that in >some shared softc. You are not seriously arguing for having a "newbus-softc" which contains only a single pointer to the 'real' softc, are you ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6940.962640821>