Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 15:07:35 -0600 From: "Eric A. Borisch" <eborisch@gmail.com> To: Tim Gustafson <tjg@ucsc.edu> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS Send / Receive Recursively Without Properties Message-ID: <CAASnNnqAOb2yLpS_HkFgRVe47LgWWQPqpVx-NLxEJ%2BUA07CBdw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAASnNnphL%2By9C-BJXQrvdabJTav3NDjg3yOmyxgLufs6Oa0WsQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyBAS728yuSbze%2BmtUTpC97qoo1O8NJtYfoaafKO-ibSEnkpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAASnNnphL%2By9C-BJXQrvdabJTav3NDjg3yOmyxgLufs6Oa0WsQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > This concern led me to avoid -R for automated transfers, and necessitated > a snapshot expiry script on the backup side. I like my backup to protect me > from at least one level of fat-fingers. :) > Let me correct this comment (it's been a while) I've avoided using -F (on the receive) with -RI (on the send), which is what I'm guessing you are doing if it is removing snapshots "for you." So: actually using -R (send), skipping -F (receive; no snapshot removal); post-xfer expiration of backup-side snapshots. Is the -u option of any use to you on the receive? You can receive it initially with -u and then set a local mount point property... - Eric
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAASnNnqAOb2yLpS_HkFgRVe47LgWWQPqpVx-NLxEJ%2BUA07CBdw>