Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 09:31:42 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= <peter@pean.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: wpa_supplicant problem. Message-ID: <52CD0CEE.5010700@pean.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokeEPBq1Tz=abJ6qmWzzn9vWH0Pno4sJ1GLHUh5iq8Qcw@mail.gmail.com> References: <79AEC286-90EB-41D0-8CA8-18A78D53C3C6@pean.org> <CAJ-Vmonr%2Bx%2BaQ1r=Sedyz3eq8sdoidxJvKtY5Gp_8WXsbzTCeA@mail.gmail.com> <8CFBC6B5-B683-4EC3-9561-EFFA6CE55755@pean.org> <CAJ-VmokeEPBq1Tz=abJ6qmWzzn9vWH0Pno4sJ1GLHUh5iq8Qcw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hehe, I dont think Im ready for 11 yet. Do you think these fixes will be in 10 any time soon? On 01/08/2014 07:30 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hm, sounds to me like something I fixed in -HEAD. Try -HEAD. > > The TL;DR - the EAPOL frames are going out at a much higher transmit > rate than the initial association attempts, which means it associates > fine but it can't authenticate successfully. > > Try running -HEAD. I bet it'll work. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52CD0CEE.5010700>