Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:59:16 -0600 From: "Mike Meyer" <mwm-dated-1011844757.76d976@mired.org> To: dan@langille.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Your Makefile has been rebuilt. Message-ID: <15432.61204.668097.438943@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <200201190351.g0J3p1D85695@lists.unixathome.org> References: <19609565@toto.iv> <200201190351.g0J3p1D85695@lists.unixathome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> types: > On 18 Jan 2002 at 21:38, Mike Meyer wrote: > > Ummm, yes... Of course, you really want to filter out everything that > > isn't a commit to ports, or a followup to such. And that's a minimal > > filter for tracking -ports. Mine is more aggressive than that, > > filtering for things that are changes to a Makefile that aren't tagged as > > either an upgrade or an update. > Hmmm, that interests me from a FreshPorts point of view. How could > http://www.FreshPorts.org help you in that regard? Make http://www.FreshPorts.org/ports-new.php3 work again. I used to throw out everything but replies for anything going to ports. My filter is actually a VM virtual of the "interesting" stuff in a cvs digest, so I've got the unfiltered digest available if I need it. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15432.61204.668097.438943>