Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Apr 2000 13:46:44 +0930 (CST)
From:      Greg Lewis <glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au>
To:        John Daniels <jmd526@hotmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: JDK1.2.2
Message-ID:  <200004210416.NAA37572@ares.trc.adelaide.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <20000420225653.65449.qmail@hotmail.com> from John Daniels at "Apr 20, 2000 06:56:53 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi John,

> I have a project that I would like to use Java for.  I would like to use the 
> latest version: 1.2.2, but I am a bit reluctant to use software that is 
> termed "Pre-Alpha."  Can anyone comment on the stability of the pre-alpha 
> jdk, especially since the blackdown port is available as a reference (or 
> bootstrap) - is FreeBSD's "pre-alpha" as stable as Blackdown's current 
> version?

I don't know that the current port has undergone enough stress testing to 
have a proper indication of its stability.  For that reason alone I'd have
to guess the current Blackdown version is more stable.

> I am running FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE.  Mr. Koster's web pages state that the 
> pre-alpha is does not build cleanly on 4.0 systems.  Is this still the case?

The current patchset will build cleanly, however its missing a critical
piece of functionality for 4.0 and 5.0.  Expect this functionality to be
present in the next patchset though (thanks Steve!) which will almost
certainly be termed "alpha".

> What advantages/disadvantages are there to using a native Java over the 
> blackdown Java running under Linux emulation?  Most of the Java ports 
> require JDK1.1.8, how difficult/possible is it to use those ports with 1) 
> "native" 1.2.2, 2) linux-based blackdown 1.2.2?

To answer the first question:

Advantage: Its much easier to do JNI with a native port.
Disadvantage: The Blackdown port has been tested much more thoroughly and
              includes a JIT (you need to compile a 3rd party JIT with
              the current FreeBSD patches -- if you want one that is).

In terms of your second question, it depends upon the ports in question.

> Sun's Forte IDE is now available ("Free") under Sun's community license - 
> are there any plans to port this?  Also, I understand that someone has IBM's 
> visualage for Java working under FreeBSD - could that be made into a port?

Can't comment on these :).

> There seem to be many difficulties working with Sun.  Even the Blackdown 
> people have had difficulties (as described on their website).  This may not 
> be nefarious - it may just be a matter of scarce resources.  But it seems 
> that the more that we can show a need for Sun's attention, the better.  As 
> such, is it possible to get support from Apple, since OSX users may benefit 
> from a Java port?

Only Apple can answer this :).  I don't know how beneficial the current
port would be towards a port of their own.

-- 
Greg Lewis 				glewis@trc.adelaide.edu.au
Computing Officer			+61 8 8303 5083
Teletraffic Research Centre


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004210416.NAA37572>