Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 23:22:08 +0200 (MET DST) From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: adhir@iagi.net (Alok K. Dhir) Cc: bob@luke.pmr.com, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, mdomsch@dellgate.us.dell.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NCR810 problem? Message-ID: <199506052122.XAA18546@blaise.ibp.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950605140852.7343A-100000@bigdipper.iagi.net> from "Alok K. Dhir" at Jun 5, 95 02:17:04 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Another strangeness of the new OS version: We're running named (and had > been under 1.1.5.1 also). Ever since upgrading, we get several "Lame > delegation to..." messages in syslog every day. Here's what they look The version of named has changed. The version in 1.1.5.1 is 4.8.2. In 2.0.5 and -current it is 4.9.3beta9. Lame delegations were not reported by the ancient version. > Jun 5 09:39:58 bigdipper named[103]: Lame delegation to 'in-addr.arpa' from [198.17.243.2] (server for '1.156.204.in-addr.arpa'?) on query on name '1.1.156.204.in-addr.arpa' > Jun 5 09:40:02 bigdipper named[103]: Lame delegation to '1.156.204.in-addr.arpa' from [168.143.0.2] (server for '1.156.204.in-addr.arpa'?) on query on name '1.1.156.204.in-addr.arpa' > [...] > > Do I have anything to worry about with these or are they normal? They re not normal in any way.. It shows that 198.17.243 and 168.143.0.2 have been declared to be secondaries when they're not. It is an error in DNS configuration. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506052122.XAA18546>