Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:47:16 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Subject: Re: libthr and 1:1 threading. Message-ID: <20030402154716.GE790@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <3E8B03E6.36871704@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030402093336.34476D-100000@fledge.watson.org> <3E8B03E6.36871704@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2003/04/02 07:38), Terry Lambert wrote: > Is the disk I/O really that big of an issue? All writes will > be on underlying non-blocking descriptors; I guess you are > saying that the interleaved I/O is more important, further > down the system call interface than the top, and this becomes > an issue? Dude, you should really try this stuff for yourself before naysaying performance improvements on principle. It's actually quite impressive for desktop users (at least). Ciao, Sheldon.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030402154716.GE790>