Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:05:24 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Cc:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org>, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: kernel malloc and M_CANWAIT 
Message-ID:  <199901182105.NAA18722@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:57:02 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.95.990118125454.8525G-100000@current1.whistle.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >     So malloc() will generally not return NULL even in low memory situations
> >     unless the KVM map fills up, which isn't supposed to happen but can in
> >     certain severe circumstances.  Callers should therefore check for NULL.
> 
> why not just put it in a loop and block on lbolt?
> (or call panic)

Because you shouldn't panic unless there's no alternative.  Panicking 
on resource starvation is just totally lame.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901182105.NAA18722>