Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:12:54 -0800 From: Tim Gustafson <tjg@ucsc.edu> To: "Eric A. Borisch" <eborisch@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS Send / Receive Recursively Without Properties Message-ID: <CAPyBAS7QEzCaRYQavhiAXB3raAh0md5sVk1mLMBWhvQqeWKQVw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAASnNnqAOb2yLpS_HkFgRVe47LgWWQPqpVx-NLxEJ%2BUA07CBdw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPyBAS728yuSbze%2BmtUTpC97qoo1O8NJtYfoaafKO-ibSEnkpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAASnNnphL%2By9C-BJXQrvdabJTav3NDjg3yOmyxgLufs6Oa0WsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAASnNnqAOb2yLpS_HkFgRVe47LgWWQPqpVx-NLxEJ%2BUA07CBdw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I've avoided using -F (on the receive) with -RI (on the send), which is what > I'm guessing you are doing if it is removing snapshots "for you." > > So: actually using -R (send), skipping -F (receive; no snapshot removal); > post-xfer expiration of backup-side snapshots. I understand, but -R on the send side is also causing the file system properties to be copied over, which is what I don't want. In particular the mount point, but really I don't need any of the properties copied over. > Is the -u option of any use to you on the receive? You can receive it > initially with -u and then set a local mount point property... I use that to keep the file system from accidentally being mounted as part of the initial sync operation, but mostly it's a no-op and harmless. -- Tim Gustafson tjg@ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyBAS7QEzCaRYQavhiAXB3raAh0md5sVk1mLMBWhvQqeWKQVw>