Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:38:01 +0100
From:      Remko Lodder <remko@freebsd.org>
To:        Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r456368 - head/security/rubygem-openssl
Message-ID:  <75DF1388-ACA6-4563-BA0A-25BDE0E21E9F@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <86d13dupmm.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca>
References:  <201712142044.vBEKiGAu076045@repo.freebsd.org> <86h8sputtf.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <1CDA8070-F7EF-4E1F-A6CB-652B92C18EBE@FreeBSD.org> <86d13dupmm.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I meant that gitlab also has copies of certain versions because it does not w=
ork otherwise..

So in that regard, my vote would be to copy the port and add it as 20 versio=
n and depend on that..


Cheers,

Remko Lodder
 /* sent from my phone and thus brief and to the point *\

> Op 17 dec. 2017 om 20:21 heeft Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org> het volge=
nde geschreven:
>=20
> Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>=20
>>> On 17 Dec 2017, at 18:51, Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
>>> Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>>>> Author: sunpoet
>>>> Date: Thu Dec 14 20:44:16 2017
>>>> New Revision: 456368
>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/456368
>=20
>>>> Log:
>>>> Update to 2.1.0
>=20
>>>> Changes:    https://github.com/ruby/openssl/blob/master/History.md
>=20
>>> Anyone mind I downgrade this back to 2.0.6?
>=20
>>> The new version, despite confirming to the Gemspec, breaks
>>> net-im/mastodon.
>=20
>>> https://github.com/ruby/openssl/issues/180
>=20
>>> Alternatively, we could copy it to create a security/rubygem-openssl20,
>>> but security/rubygem-openssl is only required by www/rubygem-ostatus2,
>>> which in turn is only required by net-im/mastodon.
>=20
>=20
>> www/gitlab also has several of those ports. I would opt for a copy and le=
ave the
>> =E2=80=98current=E2=80=99 port as is.
>=20
>> Cheers
>> remko
>=20
> Hello remko,
>=20
> I'm not clear what you mean by "those ports", but in this case nothing
> else depends on security/rubygem-openssl, so downgrading will not affect
> www/gitlab or any other port.
>=20
> Joseph




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75DF1388-ACA6-4563-BA0A-25BDE0E21E9F>