Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 17:50:01 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/11328: Upgrade x11-toolkits/fltk Message-ID: <199904270050.RAA16893@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/11328; it has been noted by GNATS. From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: cpiazza@home.net Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/11328: Upgrade x11-toolkits/fltk Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 17:44:16 -0700 (PDT) * Now, isn't it policy to use BZIP2 where possible if it decreases the * filesize? Yes, it is. At least it makes no sense going around *deleting* USE_BZIP2. * +.if OBJFORMAT=="elf" * +BROKEN= Due to ELF library format * .endif * * Erm... I tested this myself and this port does work on an ELF system (4.0-C). It should be BROKEN_ELF="reason" anyway. * Besides the addition of many extra tabs in this makefile, this doesn't seem * right. I quote from http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/porting.html: You are right. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904270050.RAA16893>