Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Oct 1999 09:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
To:        Vadim Chekan <vadim@gc.lviv.ua>
Cc:        "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Resolver in FreeBSD-3.[12] is broken?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9910140907400.26559-100000@shell.uniserve.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3806092B.E419F8D8@gc.lviv.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Vadim Chekan wrote:

> Tom wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Vadim Chekan wrote:
> > > From FreeBSD-3.2 (I checked this on 4 machines)
> > > =========================================================
> > > bash-2.03$ host 212.109.34.132
> > > 132.34.109.212.IN-ADDR.ARPA is a nickname for
> > > 132.34.109.212.cscd.lviv.ua
> > 
> >   IN-ADDR DNS for that block is definitely screwed up, because I can't
> > even get an answer from here.
> 
> What do you mean? "host 212.109.34.132" doesn't do any output for you?

  "Host not found" after a long timeout.  Your DNS delegation is probably
broken somewhere.

> >   Also, "host" in 3.2 can find CNAMEs, so it does not follow the CNAME.  I
> > think it does an ANY search.
> >   In this case, the "CNAME" has been followed.  Probably because "host"
> > did a PTR search instead of any ANY search.
> > 
> >   Whether "host" follows the CNAME or not is irrelevant.  gethostbyname()
> > should still do the right thing.
> 
> So this is just strange behavior of 'host'?
> If I understund right this is rather bind issue, not FreeBSD so that
> I'll move to more appropriate maillist :)

  Probably not.  Isn't "host" a FreeBSD thing?

> Vadim Chekan.



Tom



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9910140907400.26559-100000>