Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:06:23 +0200
From:      Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-user@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r249365 - in user/andre/tcp-ao/sys: conf crypto crypto/cmac crypto/hmac crypto/rijndael
Message-ID:  <5167B26F.3020107@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonY4veTpX0j93NSJFt71fZXTxrt5KtEByb6wsUpO7Z3iQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201304111555.r3BFtq0g019604@svn.freebsd.org> <CAJ-Vmo=yjY=hrJabjcHnR%2BA5bzHyWXC%2BYsU4bzC2BDY88T79=w@mail.gmail.com> <5167A5DA.7050109@freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmonY4veTpX0j93NSJFt71fZXTxrt5KtEByb6wsUpO7Z3iQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12.04.2013 09:04, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 11 April 2013 23:12, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> I don't know yet.  It's still some time until the code is
>> fully functional and tested.  At runtime it wont have any
>> impact until an application installs the first key on a
>> tcp socket.
>
> I'm more worried about kernel size footprint with new features.

It can easily be made a compile time option.

> I may not want this enabled on some of the tiny embedded platforms.
> Much like how I can't fit IPv6 into them at the present. :(

Who needs IPv6 anyways? ;)

-- 
Andre




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5167B26F.3020107>