Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 17:34:07 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@calcaphon.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys bus.h bus_private.h src/sys/kern subr_bus.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007031724360.21202-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <6940.962640821@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Apart from that you haven't mentioned a reason why resetting the softc > >for both functions is a better idea than having a separate softc for > >the logical device. Each function surely has some private data (for > >example resources allocated to it). Why would you want to stuff that in > >some shared softc. > > You are not seriously arguing for having a "newbus-softc" which contains > only a single pointer to the 'real' softc, are you ? If such a small softc is the consequence of a proper conceptual design of the driver, then that is fine with me. It simply expresses the fact that the function is part of a bigger entity. Nick P.S.: Please stop cutting up my e-mail in silly ways, distorting the argument. -- n_hibma@webweaving.org n_hibma@freebsd.org USB project http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.0007031724360.21202-100000>