Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:18:21 -0500
From:      bobmc <bobmc@bobmc.net>
To:        FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD on Mini-ITX has web page latency
Message-ID:  <459A93DD.3080609@bobmc.net>
In-Reply-To: <44irfp1nnl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <4596F63D.3090203@bobmc.net> <44irfp1nnl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, it seems that the driver and the hardware works so there must be
a problem in the generic part of the software.  There are plenty of tools
for networking analysis but I am not a networking adept. So I will
carefully repeat the install.  Thanks.  -Bob-

BTW, my other computer is a Biostar Ideq SFF with Via chipsets. FreeBSD
reports a 6102 ethernet but cannot map the interrupt. Instead it wants to
emulate ethernet on FireWire.  But that is for another day.  :-)

Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Bob McIsaac <bobmc@bobmc.net> writes:
> FreeBSD using Konqueor or Lynx takes more than 10 seconds.  This is puzzling since ftp transfers at 400kbs, pings of freebsd.org take 80ms, and top shows CPU is 93% idle.
>   
>
> I take it, then, that FreeBSD is the web client, not the server?  
> Have you checked for whether the delays are being caused by name
> service, before the HTTP session is even started?
>   
>> This is for a EPIA-CN130000 mini-itx with .5gb memory.
>> Note the message log sees a VT6102 LAN but the board has a 6103. Perhaps that explains the problem. Otherwise, it must be a protocol issue.
>>     
> A similarly identified interface works okay for me on my Via C3
> board.  Admittedly, they are lousy chips, but you should't notice for
> most purposes.
>
>   




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?459A93DD.3080609>